Forage harvest management impacts “Kernza” intermediate wheatgrass productivity across North America

Author:

Culman Steve1ORCID,Pinto Priscila2ORCID,Pugliese Jennie3,Crews Timothy4ORCID,DeHaan Lee4ORCID,Jungers Jake5ORCID,Larsen Jamie6,Ryan Matthew7ORCID,Schipanski Meagan8ORCID,Sulc Mark9,Wayman Sandra7,Wiedenhoeft Mary10ORCID,Stoltenberg David2,Picasso Valentin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University Pullman WA USA

2. Department of Agronomy University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison WI USA

3. USDA‐ARS Soil Drainage Research Unit Columbus OH USA

4. The Land Institute Salina KS USA

5. Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics University of Minnesota Saint Paul MN USA

6. Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada Ontario Canada

7. School of Integrative Plant Science, Soil and Crop Sciences Cornell University Ithaca NY USA

8. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USA

9. Department of Horticulture and Crop Sciences Ohio State University Columbus OH USA

10. Department of Agronomy Iowa State University Ames IA USA

Abstract

AbstractIntermediate wheatgrass [IWG, Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey, trade name Kernza] is a widely adapted, cool‐season forage grass, actively bred for perennial grain production. Most of IWG's net primary productivity is directed to nonreproductive structures, so dual‐use strategies to harvest both grain and forage represent a potentially viable pathway to increase its productivity and profitability. We conducted a 3‐year trial at nine diverse environments across North America to evaluate grain and forage yields and forage nutritive value of an early IWG breeding line under contrasting forage harvest managements. These included control (no forage harvest), summer forage harvest immediately after grain harvest, and summer forage harvest with spring or fall forage harvests. Across all sites, IWG grain yields averaged 745, 296, and 221 kg ha−1 for the first, second, and third years, respectively. Grain yields were influenced more by stand age than site. Summer forage mass after grain harvest averaged 6.0, 4.5, and 5.7 Mg ha−1 respectively for the first 3 years. Forage mass was less influenced by stand age, and more by site and forage harvest frequency. Fall forage harvest increased grain yields while spring forage harvests decreased grain yields and both treatments increased total relative feed nutritive values. Collectively, our results demonstrate that harvesting forage can improve both grain yield and forage nutritive values. Farmers growing IWG as a perennial grain can benefit from dual‐use management by harvesting both grain and forage.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3