Affiliation:
1. Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias del Litoral (ICiAgro) Universidad Nacional de Litoral (UNL), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias Esperanza Argentina
2. Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA
Abstract
AbstractThe quantification of the spatial and temporal variability of crop response to controllable inputs and the relationship with their controlling factors is important for making input prescriptions. In this study, we (1) assessed the within‐field spatial variability of corn (Zea mays L.) response to nitrogen (NR) and seed (SR) rates using on‐farm precision experiments (OFPE) data and geographically weighted regression (GWR) models; (2) determined the spatial agreement between NR and SR response classes, and their temporal stability; and (3) modeled the effect of weather and site‐specific features on the spatial distribution of the responses. Response maps were estimated by fitting GWR models to yields and as‐applied NR and SR from 14 OFPE. Responses classified into positive and non‐positive response classes were spatially joined to weather, soil, and landscape covariates to train a random forest model. GWR models explained 30%–60% of yield variation. Positive responses to NR and SR represented about 46% and 33% of fields’ area, respectively, with large variation across field‐year combinations. Temporal agreement was about 50%–60%, for NR and SR, respectively. The spatial agreement between NR and SR response classes suggests that factors controlling the crop response to these inputs are similar. In both cases, weather variables were the most important predictors, followed by landscape and soil attributes. Although weather variables acted at a field level, that is, field‐year, the latter reflected the effect of within‐field variability on crop response. To reduce this weather uncertainty, future research should consider conducting larger numbers of OFPE across multiple seasons.
Funder
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Explanatory Model Analysis
2. Bocinsky R. K.(2022).FedData: Functions to automate downloading geospatial data available from several federated data sources.https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=FedData
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献