Cognitive orientation and the prediction of decisions in a medical examination context

Author:

Westhoff Karl1,Halbach‐Suarez Christine1

Affiliation:

1. Technical University of Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany

Abstract

From the theory of cognitive orientation (Kreitler and Kreitler 1976, 1982) we derived that scores of cognitive orientation would predict the decision of women to go or not to go to a medical examination for cancer. We tested three alternative methods in addition to the standard method recommended by Kreitler and Kreitler. These four methods represent different assumptions which one can derive from the theory. On the basis of 25 interviews we developed the preliminary questionnaire of beliefs associated with the examination for early detection of cancer. The data of Study 1(N = 72) were used for item analysis as well as testing retest reliability and predicting decisions. In Study 2 (N = 142) the results could be replicated. The Likert‐scales for assessing the four components of cognitive orientation proved to be highly retest reliable. Predictions of decisions could be made nearly equally well by each of the four methods derived from the theory of cognitive orientation.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Psychology

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The cognitive orientation of patients with type 2 diabetes in Israel;Patient Education and Counseling;2004-06

2. The Motivational and Cognitive Determinants of Defense Mechanisms;Defense Mechanisms - Theoretical, Research and Clinical Perspectives;2004

3. The cognitive-orientation theory of anorexia nervosa;Journal of Clinical Psychology;2003

4. The paranoid person: cognitive motivations and personality traits;European Journal of Personality;1997-06

5. Cognitive orientation and health-protective behaviors;International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health;1997-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3