Nurse educator competence in four European countries—A comparative cross‐sectional study

Author:

Elonen Imane1ORCID,Kajander‐Unkuri Satu12ORCID,Cassar Maria3ORCID,Wennberg‐Capellades Laia4ORCID,Kean Susanne5ORCID,Sollár Tomáš6ORCID,Saaranen Terhi7ORCID,Pasanen Miko1ORCID,Salminen Leena18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine University of Turku Turku Finland

2. Diaconia University of Applied Sciences Helsinki Finland

3. Department of Nursing University of Malta Msida Malta

4. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya Barcelona Spain

5. School of Health in Social Science, Nursing Studies The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland

6. Department of Psychological Sciences Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra Nitra Slovakia

7. Department of Nursing Science University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland

8. South‐Western Hospital District Turku Finland

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of this article is to describe and compare the nurse educator competences in four European countries using three different evaluators: nurse educators (n = 329), heads of a nursing subject (n = 60) and student nurses (n = 1058).DesignThe study was conducted as a comparative cross‐sectional survey in Finland, Malta, Slovakia and Spain between May 2021 and February 2022.MethodsThe data were collected with an online survey. The instrument used was a 20‐item Tool for Evaluation of Requirements of Nurse Teachers, utilizing a 5‐point Likert‐type scale. The data were analysed statistically and reported according to STROBE guidelines.ResultsNurse educators' competence evaluated positively in all the groups of evaluators, with a mean of >3.5. The self‐evaluation of nurse educators' competence was higher than the other evaluators' evaluations. Having a degree in nursing, having completed some pedagogical studies and longer work experience as a nurse educator had a positive association with higher self‐evaluated competence among nurse educators.ConclusionsNurse educator competence is at a good level in the selected European countries, but further studies are required to find the reasons behind the differences in evaluations.Public ContributionEach participating educational institution named a contact person who distributed the surveys to the participants and returned the study's metadata to the researchers.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Reference35 articles.

1. ALLEA All European Academies. (2017).The European code of conduct for research integrity. Revised edition available online:https://allea.org/code‐of‐conduct/

2. Accounting for research fatigue in research ethics

3. Pedagogical Nursing Practice: Redefining nursing practice for the academic nurse educator

4. Preparation of academic nurse educators

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3