Affiliation:
1. University of Georgia's Savannah River Ecology Laboratory Drawer E Aiken SC 29802 USA
2. Department of Wildlife Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue Davis CA 95616 USA
3. University of Georgia's Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources 180 E Green Street Athens GA 30602 USA
Abstract
AbstractMojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) populations in some regions have declined by >50% since 2004, prompting the need for more research on ways to recover populations. One possible recovery tool is head‐starting (i.e., the act of protecting and raising juvenile tortoises to sizes that increase survival upon release); however, head‐starting can have high start‐up and maintenance costs that can limit its feasibility. Strategies that reduce cost and rearing duration may foster broader and more effective use. We released and radio‐tracked 60 juvenile tortoises in the Mojave National Preserve in California, USA, that had been reared under 2 treatments: those reared 1 year indoors after hatching, then 1 year outdoors (combo) and those reared just 1 year indoors (indoor‐only). We tested whether indoor‐only rearing alone could be a more efficient means of producing robust head‐started tortoises. We examined the behavior, movement, and survival of tortoises after release into the wild from 2020 to 2021 to determine whether these outcomes differed between husbandry treatments. Combo tortoises tended to perform settling behaviors (mean ± 1 SE days to building first burrow = 6.7 ± 0.8, entering dormancy = 23.3 ± 2.1, and emerging from dormancy = 189.6 ± 4.4) earlier than indoor‐only tortoises (7.4 ± 0.9, 31.5 ± 2.6, and 193.9 ± 5.9, respectively), but this difference was not significant, suggesting the rearing method did not greatly alter settling behavior. Indoor‐only tortoises dispersed at least twice as far from their release site (156.2 ± 26.3 m compared with 77.3 ± 20.6 m for combo tortoises), had larger mean use areas (3.7 ± 0.1 ha compared with 2.8 ± 0.3 ha for combo tortoises for 95% Brownian bridge movement model estimates), and greater variability in their movements than combo tortoises (daily average step length post‐emergence: 4.3 ± 0.2 m compared with 2.8 ± 0.1 m for combo tortoises). Despite differences in their movements, indoor‐only and combo tortoises had similar survival rates over the study, 51% versus 42%, respectively, during a period of extreme drought in 2021. The similarity in survival between groups gives head‐starting practitioners freedom in their rearing methods. The indoor‐only group had lower site fidelity, which should be considered when this is an undesirable trait for released tortoises.
Funder
California Energy Commission
National Park Service
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Reference79 articles.
1. Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling
2. Mammalian mesocarnivore visitation at tortoise burrows in a wind farm
3. Population trends in Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii);Allison L. J.;Herpetological Conservation and Biology,2018
4. Applied Climate Information System.2022. NOWData—NOAA Online Weather Data. . Accessed 24 Apr 2022.
5. Bates D. M.Maechler B.Bolker S.Walker R. H. B.Christensen H.Singmann B.Dai G.Grothendieck andP.Green.2017. lme4: linear mixed‐effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. Version 1.1‐13.http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/