A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making

Author:

Smith Christian A.1ORCID,Tantillo James A.2,Hale Benjamin3,Decker Daniel J.4,Forstchen Ann B.5,Pomeranz Emily F.6,Lauber T. Bruce4,Schiavone Michael V.7,Frohlich Kipp8,Lederle Patrick E.9,Benedict R. Joseph10,Hurst Jeremy11,King Richard12,Siemer William F.4,Baumer Meghan S.4

Affiliation:

1. Wildlife Management Institute 2559 Primrose Lane Helena MT 59601 USA

2. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA

3. Department of Environmental Studies and Department of Philosophy University of Colorado, Boulder 4001 Discovery Drive Boulder CO 80303 USA

4. Center for Conservation Social Science, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA

5. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 100 8th Avenue SE St. Petersburg FL 33701 USA

6. Michigan Department of Natural Resources 4166 Legacy Parkway Lansing MI 48911 USA

7. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany NY 12233 USA

8. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 South Meridian Street Tallahassee FL 32399 USA

9. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 480 Wilson Road #13 East Lansing MI 48909 USA

10. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency 5107 Edmondson Pike Nashville TN 37211 USA

11. Division of Wildlife New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany NY 12233 USA

12. Wyoming Game and Fish Department 5400 Bishop Boulevard Cheyenne WY 82006 USA

Abstract

AbstractWildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3