Early versus persistent Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Is there a difference in patient reported outcomes following rehabilitation?

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundExpert consensus asserts that early treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) leads to better outcomes. Yet no evidence supports this assumption regarding the recognized gold standard of multidisciplinary functional rehabilitation. To address this, we aimed to establish if there is a difference in outcomes between early CRPS (<1 year symptom duration) and persistent CRPS (= >1 year symptom duration) following rehabilitation and whether any gains are maintained at three months.MethodSecondary analysis was conducted on previously collected clinical Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) data from 218 patients attending a residential multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme. Datasets were categorized into early CRPS (n = 40) or persistent CRPS (n = 178) dependent on symptom duration. Function, pain, self‐efficacy, kinesiophobia and psychological health domains were compared using repeated measures analysis of covariance for a two group design for group difference post rehabilitation and at three month follow‐up.ResultsPost‐rehabilitation, both groups improved in pain, function, kinesiophobia, psychological health and self‐efficacy. At three months, the persistent CRPS group maintained improvements in pain and function. This was not achieved in early CRPS.ConclusionThis exploratory study is the first to empirically test the assumption that those with early CRPS have better outcomes following rehabilitation. Our clinical data challenges this, as both early and persistent CRPS groups improved following rehabilitation. Findings indicate that rehabilitation benefits those with CRPS, regardless of symptom duration. However, unlike early CRPS, those with persistent CRPS sustain gains at follow‐up. Further prospective exploration is warranted.SignificanceExpert consensus recommends early treatment for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, yet there is little empirical evidence to support this. Our findings are the first to challenge this assumption by revealing no difference in outcomes between early and persistent CRPS post‐rehabilitation. However, those with persistent CRPS maintain gains after three months, unlike people with early CRPS (symptoms < one year). These findings are relevant to clinical practice as they challenge established assumptions, suggesting a focus on improving early CRPS follow‐up outcomes.