Limitations in Faculty Advancement for Underrepresented Groups in Academic Otolaryngology

Author:

Kim Sul Gi1ORCID,Russel Sarah M.2ORCID,Stack Taylor J.1ORCID,Frank‐Ito Dennis O.3ORCID,Farzal Zainab4ORCID,Ebert Charles S.2,Buckmire Robert A.2,Demason Christine E.2,Shah Rupali N.2

Affiliation:

1. University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina U.S.A.

2. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill North Carolina U.S.A.

3. Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences Duke University Durham North Carolina U.S.A.

4. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco California U.S.A.

Abstract

ObjectiveDespite the increasing racial diversity of the United States, representation in academic medicine faculty does not reach concordance with the general population and worsens with higher rank. Few studies have examined this within academic Otolaryngology and surgical subspecialties. This project aims to compare rank equity in academic Otolaryngology on self‐reported gender and race/ethnicity between the years 2000 and 2020.MethodsPublicly available data were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges under the “Data & Reports” section for the years 2000 and 2020. The report comprised of full‐time faculty from all U.S. medical schools. To determine parity between faculty ranks across gender and race/ethnicity, rank equity index (REI) was calculated for associate/assistant, professor/associate, and professor/assistant professor comparisons.ResultsThe percentage of women faculty in Otolaryngology has increased from 21% in 2000 to 37% in 2020; however, they did not achieve parity at all rank comparisons for both years. On the contrary, men were above parity at all rank comparisons. Improvements in rank equity occurred for Black/African American (Black) and Hispanic Latino/Spanish Origin (Latine) faculty between the years 2000 and 2020; however, when accounting for gender, benefits were concentrated among men.ConclusionAdvancement along the academic ladder is limited for women of all racial groups in academic Otolaryngology. While improved rank equity was seen for Black and Latine faculty, these improvements were largely among men. Future directions should aim to identify barriers to recruitment, retention, and promotion for women and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) academic otolaryngologists and create interventions that diversify Otolaryngology faculty at all ranks.Level of EvidenceN/A Laryngoscope, 2023

Funder

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3