Value chain interventions for improving women's economic empowerment: A mixed‐methods systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Malhotra Suchi Kapoor12ORCID,Mantri Swati1,Gupta Neha1,Bhandari Ratika1,Armah Ralph Nii3,Alhassan Hamdiyah4,Young Sarah5,White Howard16,Puskur Ranjitha7,Waddington Hugh Sharma8,Masset Edoardo9

Affiliation:

1. Campbell South Asia Vasant Kunj Delhi India

2. Global Development Network Vasant Kunj New Delhi India

3. Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research University of Ghana Accra Ghana

4. Department of Applied Economics University for Development Studies Tamale Ghana

5. Research and Academic Services Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

6. Campbell Collaboration, Global Development Network Lanzhou University Lanzhou China

7. Sustainable Impact Platform, International Rice Research Institute Los Baños Philippines

8. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK

9. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre of Excellence in Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL) London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundValue chain interventions have become widespread throughout the international development sector over the last 20 years, and there is a need to evaluate their effectiveness in improving women's welfare across multiple dimensions. Agricultural value chains are influenced by socio‐cultural norms and gender dynamics that have an impact on the distribution of resources, benefits, and access to opportunities. While women play a critical role in agriculture, they are generally confined to the least‐valued parts of the value chain with the lowest economic returns, depending on the local, social and institutional contexts.ObjectivesThe review assesses the effectiveness of approaches, strategies and interventions focused on women's engagement in agricultural value chains that lead to women's economic empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries. It explores the contextual barriers and facilitators that determine women's participation in value chains and ultimately impact their effectiveness.Search MethodsWe searched completed and on‐going studies from Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection (Social Sciences Citation Index [SSCI], Science Citation Index Expanded [SCI‐EXPANDED], Conference Proceedings Citation Index – Science [CPCI‐S], Conference Proceedings Citation Index – Social Science & Humanities [CPCI‐SSH], and Emerging Sources Citation Index [ESCI]), International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, EconLit, Business Source Premier, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane, Database of Systematic Reviews, CAB Abstracts and Sociological Abstracts. We also searched relevant websites such as Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers (CGIAR); the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD); AgriProFocus; the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); Donor Committee for Enterprise Development; the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO); the International Labour Organisation (ILO); the Netherlands Development Organisation; USAID; the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation; the International Food Policy Research Institute; World Agroforestry; the International Livestock Research Institute; the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office; the British Library for Development Studies (BLDS); AGRIS; the IMMANA grant database; the 3ie impact evaluation database; Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA); The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J‐PAL); the World Bank IEG evaluations; the USAID Development Data Library; Experience Clearinghouse; the proceedings of the Agriculture, Nutrition and Health Academy conference; the proceedings of the Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE) Conference; the proceedings of the North East Universities Development Consortium (NEUDC) Conference; and the World Bank Economic Review. The database search was conducted in March 2022, and the website search was completed in August 2022.Selection CriteriaThe review includes value chain interventions evaluating the economic empowerment outcomes. The review includes effectiveness studies (experimental and non‐experimental studies with a comparison group) and process evaluations.Data Collection and AnalysisTwo review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, critically appraised the studies, and synthesised findings.ResultsWe found that value chain interventions are successful in improving the economic conditions of their intended beneficiaries. The interventions were found to improve women's economic outcomes such as income, assets holdings, productivity, and savings, but these effects were small in size and limited by low confidence in methodological quality. The meta‐analysis suggests that this occurs more via the acquisition of skills and improved inputs, rather than through improvement in access to profitable markets. The qualitative evidence on interventions points to the persistence of cultural barriers and other constraints. Those interventions implemented in Sub‐Saharan Africa and South Asia are consistently more successful for all outcomes considered, although there are few studies conducted in other areas of the world.ConclusionsThe review concludes that value chain interventions empower women, but perhaps to a lesser extent than expected. Economic empowerment does not immediately translate into empowerment within families and communities. Interventions should either moderate their expectations of empowerment goals, or they should be implemented in a way that ensures higher rates of participation among women and the acquisition of greater decision‐making power.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference172 articles.

1. The role of Grameen Ghana in improving income of women shea butter processors;Al‐Hassan S.;Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics,2011

2. Ambler K. Jones K. &O'Sullivan M.(2018).What is the role of men in connecting women to cash crop markets? Evidence from Uganda (Discussion Papers No.1762). IFPRI.

3. Anand P. Saxena S. Gonzalez R. &H D. H. A.(2019).Can women's self‐help groups contribute to sustainable development? Evidence of capability changes from Northern India (Policy Research Working Paper No.9011). World Bank.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3