Representativeness of samples enrolled in Alzheimer's disease research centers

Author:

Arce Rentería Miguel1ORCID,Mobley Taylor M.2,Evangelista Nicole D.3,Medina Luis D.4,Deters Kacie D.5,Fox‐Fuller Joshua T.6,Minto Lex R.7,Avila‐Rieger Justina1,Bettcher Brianne M.8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University Medical Center New York City New York USA

2. Department of Epidemiology University of California Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health Los Angeles California USA

3. Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory College of Public Health and Health Professions, McKnight Brain Institute University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

4. Department of Psychology University of Houston Houston Texas USA

5. Department of Integrative Biology & Physiology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA

6. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA

7. Department of Psychology Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA

8. Behavioral Neurology Section Department of Neurology University of Colorado Alzheimer's and Cognition Center University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractTo generalize findings on the mechanisms and prognosis in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), it is critical for ADRD research to be representative of the population. Sociodemographic and health characteristics across ethnoracial groups included in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center sample (NACC) were compared to the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS).Baseline NACC data (n = 36,639) and the weighted 2010 HRS wave (N = 52,071,840) were included. We assessed covariate balance by calculating standardized mean differences across harmonized covariates (i.e., sociodemographic, health).NACC participants were older, more educated, with worse subjective memory and hearing, but endorsed fewer depressive symptoms compared to HRS participants. While all racial and ethnic groups in NACC differed from HRS participants in the same way overall, these differences were further amplified between racial and ethnic groups.NACC participants do not represent the U.S. population in key demographic and health factors, which differed by race and ethnicity.HIGHLIGHTS We examined selection factors included in NACC studies compared to a nationally representative sample. Selection factors included demographic and health factors and self‐reported memory concerns. Results suggest that NACC participants are not representative of the U.S. population. Importantly, selection factors differed across racial and ethnic groups. Findings are suggestive of selection bias within NACC studies.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3