Impact of Frailty on Postoperative Outcomes in Extended Endonasal Skull Base Surgery for Suprasellar Pathologies

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveFrailty metrics estimate a patient's ability to tolerate physiologic stress and there are limited frailty data in patients undergoing expanded endonasal approaches (EEA) for suprasellar pathologies. Elevated frailty metrics have been associated with increased perioperative complications in patients undergoing craniotomies. We sought to examine this potential relationship in EEA.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingTwo tertiary academic skull base centers.MethodsCases of patients undergoing EEA for suprasellar pathologies were reviewed. Demographic, treatment, survival, and postoperative outcomes data were recorded. Frailty was calculated using validated indexes, including the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, the modified 5‐item frailty index (mFI‐5), and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Primary outcomes included 30‐day medical and surgical complications.ResultsA total of 88 patients were included, with 59 (67%) female patients and a mean age of 54 ± 15 years. The most common pathologies included 53 meningiomas (60.2%) and 21 craniopharyngiomas (23.9%). Most patients were ASA class 3 (54.5%) with mean mFI‐5 0.82 ± 1.01 and CCI 4.18 ± 2.42. There was no association between increased frailty and 30‐day medical or surgical outcomes (including postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak), prolonged length of hospital stay, or mortality (all P > .05). Higher mFI‐5 was associated with an increased risk for 30‐day readmission (odds ratio: 2.35, 95% confidence Interval: 1.10‐5.64, P = .04).ConclusionDespite the patient population being notably frail, we only identified an increased risk for 30‐day readmission and observed no links with deteriorating surgical, medical, or mortality outcomes. This implies that conventional frailty metrics may not effectively align with EEA outcomes.