T1 colorectal cancer patients' perspective on information provision and therapeutic decision‐making after local resection

Author:

Dekkers Nik1ORCID,Dang Hao1ORCID,de Graaf Manon1,Nobbenhuis Kate1,Verhoeven Daan A.1ORCID,van der Kraan Jolein1,de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel Wouter H.2,Alkhalaf Alaa2,van Westreenen Henderik L.3,Basiliya Kirill1,Peeters Koen C. M. J.4,Westerterp Marinke5,Doornebosch Pascal G.6,Hardwick James C. H.1ORCID,Langers Alexandra M. J.1,Boonstra Jurjen J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Isala Hospital Zwolle The Netherlands

3. Department of Surgery Isala Hospital Zwolle The Netherlands

4. Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

5. Department of Surgery Haaglanden Medical Center The Hague The Netherlands

6. Department of Surgery IJsselland Hospital Capelle aan den IJssel The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDecision‐making after local resection of T1 colorectal cancer (T1CRC) is often complex and calls for optimal information provision as well as active patient involvement.ObjectiveThe aim was to evaluate the perceptions of patients with T1CRC on information provision and therapeutic decision‐making.MethodsThis multicenter cross‐sectional study included patients who underwent endoscopic or local surgical resection as initial treatment. Information provision was assessed using the EORTC QLQ‐INFO25 questionnaire. In patients with high‐risk T1CRC, we evaluated decisional involvement and satisfaction regarding the choice as to whether to undergo additional treatment after local resection, and the level of decisional conflict using the Decisional Conflict Scale.ResultsNinety‐eight patients with T1CRC were included (72% response rate; 79/98 endoscopic and 19/98 local surgical resection; 45/98 high‐risk T1CRC). Median time since local resection was 28 months (IQR 18); none had developed recurrence. Unmet information needs were reported by 29 patients (30%; 18 low‐risk, 11 high‐risk), mostly on post‐treatment related topics (follow‐up visits, recovery time, recurrence prevention). After local resection, 24 of the 45 high‐risk patients (53%) underwent additional treatment, while others were subjected to surveillance. Higher‐educated patients were more often actively involved in decision‐making (93% vs. 43%, p = 0.002) and more frequently underwent additional treatment (79% vs. 40%, p = 0.02). Decisional conflict (p = 0.19) and satisfaction (p = 0.78) were comparable between higher‐ and lower‐educated high‐risk patients.ConclusionGreater attention should be given to the post‐treatment course during consultations following local T1CRC resection. The differences in decisional involvement and selected management strategies between higher‐ and lower‐educated high‐risk patients warrant further investigation.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3