Hourglass‐like constrictions on MRI are common in electromyography‐confirmed cases of neuralgic amyotrophy (Parsonage–Turner syndrome): A tertiary referral center experience

Author:

Sneag Darryl B.1ORCID,Urban Casey2,Li Tim Y.3,Colucci Philip G.1ORCID,Pedrick Emily G.1,Nimura Clare A.1ORCID,Feinberg Joseph H.4,Milani Carlo J.4,Tan Ek T.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology and Imaging Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA

2. Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA

3. Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA

4. Department of Physiatry Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction/AimsHourglass‐like constrictions (HGCs) of involved nerves in neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) (Parsonage–Turner syndrome) have been increasingly recognized with magnetic resonance neurography (MRN). This study sought to determine the sensitivity of HGCs, detected by MRN, among electromyography (EMG)‐confirmed NA cases.MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed records of patients with the clinical diagnosis of NA, and with EMG confirmation, who underwent 3‐Tesla MRN within 90 days of EMG at a single tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2021. “Severe NA” positive cases were defined by a clinical diagnosis and specific EMG criteria: fibrillation potentials or positive sharp waves, along with motor unit recruitment (MUR) grades of “discrete” or “none.” On MRN, one or more HGCs, defined as focally decreased nerve caliber or diffusely beaded appearance, was considered “imaging‐positive.” Post hoc inter‐rater reliability for HGCs was measured by comparing the original MRN report against subsequent blinded interpretation by a second radiologist.ResultsA total of 123 NA patients with 3‐Tesla MRN performed within 90 days of EMG were identified. HGCs were observed in 90.2% of all NA patients. In “severe NA” cases, based on the above EMG criteria, HGC detection resulted in a sensitivity of 91.9%. Nerve‐by‐nerve analysis (183 nerve‐muscle pairs, nerves assessed by MRN, muscles assessed by EMG) showed a sensitivity of 91.0%. The second radiologist largely agreed with the original HGC evaluation, (94.3% by subjects, 91.8% by nerves), with no significant difference between evaluations (subjects: χ2 = 2.27, P = .132, nerves: χ2 = 0.98, P = .323).DiscussionMRN detection of HGCs is common in NA.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Neurology (clinical),Physiology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3