Color representations of normals and congenital red–green color deficiencies based on differential scaling of color‐names and color‐naming experiments

Author:

Ohkoba Minoru1ORCID,Ishikawa Tomoharu2ORCID,Kanari Kota1,Hira Shoko3ORCID,Ohtsuka Sakuichi4ORCID,Ayama Miyoshi5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Engineering Utsunomiya University Utsunomiya Japan

2. School of Engineering Utsunomiya University Utsunomiya Japan

3. Graduate School of Science and Engineering Kagoshima University Kagoshima Japan

4. Department of Science and Technology International College of Technology Kanazawa Japan

5. Center for Optical Research and Education Utsunomiya University Utsunomiya Japan

Abstract

AbstractOur previous work revealed that the vision‐based color representation of congenitally color‐deficient observers (CDOs) was mostly C‐shaped bending at yellow and blue that differed from circular shape of the observers with no color vision deficiencies called CNOs in the study. In this study, the color‐name‐based internal color representation was investigated for the same observers and its relation to the vision‐based color representation was examined. First, psychological difference of all combinations of 10 color names corresponding to the Munsell basic hues was rated using a 5‐point scale. The distances of all pairs of CNOs and the CDOs agreed well with each other, in contrast to the distinctive differences in the vision‐based color representation. Second, color‐naming was conducted to the 10 color chips for each of high and medium chroma to link the vision‐based and color‐name‐based representations through the test stimuli. For the high chroma chips, color naming property of the CDOs was similar to that of the CNOs. In contrast, CDOs showed distinctively larger intra‐ and inter‐observer variabilities than CNOs for the medium chroma chips. The difference between two color chips was estimated using the results of the color naming and extended color‐name difference ratings which is called “color‐naming difference.” No systematic relationship was observed among the color‐chip difference, color‐name difference, and color naming difference in individual comparisons. It indicated that the color‐naming difference is greater for the pairs including YR/Y/GY versus G/B, and vice versa for the pairs consisting of BG, B, PB, P, and RP. These suggest the followings; first, CDOs seem to utilize lightness difference strategically in the visual assessment, second, psychological differences among “blue,” “green,” “purple,” or “gray” are distinct for CDOs although the color chips given those names in our experiment appear close.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

Wiley

Reference45 articles.

1. The nature of normal trichromatic and dichromatic vision

2. Diagnostic test for color vision;Wright WD;Ann R Coll Surg Engl,1957

3. Worldwide prevalence of red-green color deficiency

4. CIE 240:2020.Enhancement of Images for Colour‐Deficient Observers.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3