Quality-of-care initiative in patients treated surgically for perforated peptic ulcer

Author:

,Møller M H1,Larsson H J2,Rosenstock S3,Jørgensen H4,Johnsen S P2,Madsen A H5,Adamsen S6,Jensen A G7,Zimmermann-Nielsen E8,Thomsen R W2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, and Departments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

3. Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

4. Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

5. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Regional Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark

6. Copenhagen University Hospital Køge, Copenhagen, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

7. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

8. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Regional Hospital Kolding, Kolding, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background Mortality and morbidity are considerable after treatment for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). Since 2003, a Danish nationwide quality-of-care (QOC) improvement initiative has focused on reducing preoperative delay, and improving perioperative monitoring and care for patients with PPU. The present study reports the results of this initiative. Methods This was a nationwide cohort study based on prospectively collected data, involving all hospitals caring for patients with PPU in Denmark. Details of patients treated surgically for PPU between September 2004 and August 2011 were reported to the Danish Clinical Register of Emergency Surgery. Changes in baseline patient characteristics and in seven QOC indicators are presented, including relative risks (RRs) for achievement of the indicators. Results The study included 2989 patients. An increasing number fulfilled the following four QOC indicators in 2010–2011 compared with the first 2 years of monitoring: preoperative delay no more than 6 h (59·0 versus 54·0 per cent; P = 0·030), daily monitoring of bodyweight (48·0 versus 29·0 per cent; P < 0·001), daily monitoring of fluid balance (79·0 versus 74·0 per cent; P = 0·010) and daily monitoring of vital signs (80·0 versus 68·0 per cent; P < 0·001). A lower proportion of patients had discontinuation of routine prophylactic antibiotics (82·0 versus 90·0 per cent; P < 0·001). Adjusted 30-day mortality decreased non-significantly from 2005–2006 to 2010–2011 (adjusted RR 0·87, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·76 to 1·00), whereas the rate of reoperative surgery remained unchanged (adjusted RR 0·98, 0·78 to 1·23). Conclusion This nationwide quality improvement initiative was associated with reduced preoperative delay and improved perioperative monitoring in patients with PPU. A non-significant improvement was seen in 30-day mortality.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Quality of fluid balance charting and interventions to improve it: a systematic review;BMJ Open Quality;2023-12

2. Risk Factors for Postoperative Morbidity, Suture Insufficiency, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Gastroduodenal Perforation;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2023-09-29

3. Clinical Management of Endotoxemia: Source Control;Endotoxin Induced-Shock: a Multidisciplinary Approach in Critical Care;2023

4. Surgical Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery;Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques;2022-08-30

5. Quality Improvement in Vascular Surgery;European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery;2022-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3