Disease‐modifying therapies for sickle cell disease: Decisional needs and supports among adolescents and young adults

Author:

Ding Ke1ORCID,Bear Benjamin2,Sood Erica234,Alderfer Melissa24,Crosby Lori56ORCID,Hildenbrand Aimee K.124ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics Division of Behavioral Health Nemours Children's Health Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Center for Healthcare Delivery Science Nemours Children's Health Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Nemours Cardiac Center Nemours Children's Health Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Pediatrics Sidney Kimmel Medical College Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio USA

6. Department of Pediatrics College of Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundShared decision‐making is one promising solution to addressing barriers in use of disease‐modifying therapies for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with sickle cell disease (SCD). A thorough understanding of decisional needs can guide the development of decisional supports and promote shared decision‐making.ProcedureInformed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF), we conducted a qualitative analysis to assess decisional needs and supports reported by AYAs with SCD, their caregivers, and healthcare providers. Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with AYAs and their caregivers, and online crowdsourcing was used with SCD providers. Thematic and descriptive content analyses were used to summarize perspectives on decisional needs and supports regarding disease‐modifying therapies.ResultsFourteen AYAs (Mage = 21 years, 57% male, 93% non‐Hispanic Black, 79% HbSS), 11 caregivers (80% female, 100% non‐Hispanic Black), and 40 healthcare providers (65% female, 65% non‐Hispanic White, Myears in practice = 14.8 years, 75% physicians) participated. Thematic analysis revealed needs related to: decisional conflict, inadequate knowledge, unclear expectations, and inadequate supports and resources. Six forms of support emerged as important for decision‐making: establishing an open and trusting patient/family–provider relationship, providing information, accepting ambivalence and unreadiness, supporting implementation of a decision, addressing inadequate health and social services, and promoting adequate social, emotional, and instrumental help.ConclusionsThis is the first study to assess decisional needs and supports for AYAs with SCD considering disease‐modifying therapies. Additional research is needed to examine which decision supports are the most impactful to promote effective shared decision‐making in this population.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3