Experimental determination of magnetic field quality conversion factors for eleven ionization chambers in 1.5 T and 0.35 T MR‐linac systems

Author:

Orlando Nathan12,Crosby Jennie3,Glide‐Hurst Carri34,Culberson Wesley4,Keller Brian12,Sarfehnia Arman12

Affiliation:

1. Odette Cancer Centre Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Department of Radiation Oncology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Carbone Cancer Center Department of Human Oncology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

4. Department of Medical Physics School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe static magnetic field present in magnetic resonance (MR)‐guided radiotherapy systems can influence dose deposition and charged particle collection in air‐filled ionization chambers. Thus, accurately quantifying the effect of the magnetic field on ionization chamber response is critical for output calibration. Formalisms for reference dosimetry in a magnetic field have been proposed, whereby a magnetic field quality conversion factor kB,Q is defined to account for the combined effects of the magnetic field on the radiation detector. Determination of kB,Q in the literature has focused on Monte Carlo simulation studies, with experimental validation limited to only a few ionization chamber models.PurposeThe purpose of this study is to experimentally measure kB,Q for 11 ionization chamber models in two commercially available MR‐guided radiotherapy systems: Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian.MethodsEleven ionization chamber models were characterized in this study: Exradin A12, A12S, A28, and A26, PTW T31010, T31021, and T31022, and IBA FC23‐C, CC25, CC13, and CC08. The experimental method to measure kB,Q utilized cross‐calibration against a reference Exradin A1SL chamber. Absorbed dose to water was measured for the reference A1SL chamber positioned parallel to the magnetic field with its centroid placed at the machine isocenter at a depth of 10 cm in water for a 10 × 10 cm2 field size at that depth. Output was subsequently measured with the test chamber at the same point of measurement. kB,Q for the test chamber was computed as the ratio of reference dose to test chamber output, with this procedure repeated for each chamber in each MR‐guided radiotherapy system. For the high‐field 1.5 T Elekta Unity system, the dependence of kB,Q on the chamber orientation relative to the magnetic field was quantified by rotating the chamber about the machine isocenter.ResultsMeasured kB,Q values for our test dataset of ionization chamber models ranged from 0.991 to 1.002, and 0.995 to 1.004 for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian, respectively, with kB,Q tending to increase as the chamber sensitive volume increased. Measured kB,Q values largely agreed within uncertainty to published Monte Carlo simulation data and available experimental data. kB,Q deviation from unity was minimized for ionization chamber orientation parallel or antiparallel to the magnetic field, with increased deviations observed at perpendicular orientations. Overall (k = 1) uncertainty in the experimental determination of the magnetic field quality conversion factor, kB,Q was 0.71% and 0.72% for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian systems, respectively.ConclusionsFor a high‐field MR‐linac, the characterization of ionization chamber performance as angular orientation varied relative to the magnetic field confirmed that the ideal orientation for output calibration is parallel. For most of these chamber models, this study represents the first experimental characterization of chamber performance in clinical MR‐linac beams. This is a critical step toward accurate output calibration for MR‐guided radiotherapy systems and the measured kB,Q values will be an important reference data source for forthcoming MR‐linac reference dosimetry protocols.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3