Image‐guided multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging‐transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy augmented with a sextant versus an extended template random biopsy: Comparison of cancer detection rates, complication and functional outcomes

Author:

Adams Eric S.1ORCID,Deivasigamani Sriram1ORCID,Kotamarti Srinath1ORCID,Wolf Steven2,Mottaghi Mahdi3ORCID,Aminsharifi Ali14,Taha Terek5,Seguier Denis16ORCID,Michael Zoe1,Ivey Michael7ORCID,Gupta Rajan T.17ORCID,Polascik Thomas J.137ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urologic Surgery Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA

2. Department of Biostatistics Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA

3. Institute of Medical Research Veteran Affairs Medical System Durham North Carolina USA

4. Department of Urology Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Urology Ziv Medical Center Safed Israel

6. Department of Urology Lille University Lille France

7. Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo compare the efficacy of a novel fusion template “reduced six‐core systemic template and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion targeted biopsy” (TBx+6c), with mpMRI/TRUS fusion‐targeted biopsy and 12‐core systematic biopsy template (TBx+12c) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa).Materials and MethodsThis is an institutional review board approved single‐center observational study involving adult men undergoing fusion‐targeted biopsies for the diagnosis of PCa. Patients were sorted into cohorts of TBx+6c or TBx+12c based on the systematic biopsy template used. The study's main objective was to determine the cancer detection rate (CDR) for overall PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and the secondary objectives were to compare complication rates and functional outcome differences between the cohort.ResultsA total of 204 patients met study's inclusion criteria. TBx+6c group had 120 patients, while TBx+12c cohort had 84 patients. The groups had similar baseline characteristics and overall CDR in the TBx+6c cohort was 71.7% versus 79.8%, compared to the TBx+12c (p = 0.18) whereas, the csPCa detection rate in the TBx+6c group was 50.8% versus 54.8% in the TBx+12c group (p = 0.5). TBx+6c cohort had lower overall complication rate of 3% versus 13%, (p = 0.01) and ≥ grade 2 complication rates (1 (1%) vs. 3(4%), p = 0.03) compared to the TBx+12c cohort. There were no differences in IIEF‐5 (p = 0.5) or IPSS (p = 0.1) scores at baseline and 2‐weeks and 6‐weeks post‐biopsy.ConclusionTBx+6c cohort, when compared to the TBx+12c cohort, demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance along with similar functional outcomes and lower complication rates. These results suggest the importance of further exploring the clinical implications of adopting a TBx+6c schema for PCa diagnosis in comparison to the widely used TBx+12c schema through a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3