Affiliation:
1. Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland
2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics AGH University of Krakow Krakow Poland
Abstract
AbstractThe subject of the research conducted by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was hydrated mixtures of polyethylene glycol and gentamicin (GEN) in a 1:1 (w/w) ratio. In this way, a system with a particularly high ability to form hydrogen bonds was created. It was postulated that studying the effective activation energy (EA) of the thawing process of diverse hydrated polymer mixtures will indirectly allow for an attempt to assess the distribution of water molecules in the examined material in future studies. This article presents a detailed analysis of the impact of selected parameters on the calculation of EA using the Belichmaer and Duswalt methods. The research focused on assessing how the interpolation method affects the accuracy of results obtained from these techniques. The interpolation method was analyzed in terms of its ability to accurately replicate experimental data. By evaluating the impact of the number of points from the DSC curve used in linear interpolation, a standard deviation from the average value of EA was obtained, respectively: 2.4% for the Belichmaer method and 1.9% for the Duswalt method. The article also shows that by using both methods simultaneously, it is possible to detect the moment when additional endothermic and exothermic reaction activity becomes present in the reaction curve. This allowed for the avoidance of the depletion error. Computer modeling and simulations were used to compare the effectiveness of both techniques in various scenarios. The results showed that the choice of interpolation method and taking into account the depletion error significantly affect the accuracy of calculating EA. The computed activation energy via Duswalt method was EA = 363.32 kJ mol−1 with a standard deviation of 7.07 kJ mol−1 and using the Belichmaer method the EA was 364.81 kJ mol−1, with a standard deviation of 9.10 kJ mol−1.