Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Salivary Function: A Systematic Review

Author:

Gulati Arushi1ORCID,Kidane Joseph1ORCID,Chang Jolie L.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Francisco California USA

2. Surgery Service Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center San Francisco California USA

Abstract

ObjectiveA number of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) assess quality of life and symptom severity in patients with salivary gland dysfunction, but many vary in the extent of validation and domain types addressed. We identified PROMs validated to measure salivary gland function and analyzed key properties.Data SourcesPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL.Review MethodsA systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Validated instruments with >1 item to assess salivary gland‐related symptoms were included. PROMs were evaluated for developmental methodology, structure, validity, and reliability using Consensus‐based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria.ResultsA total of 2059 abstracts were retrieved, and 133 full‐text articles were reviewed. Sixteen PROMs assessing xerostomia (n = 7), sialadenitis (n = 4), Sjogren's syndrome (n = 2), Parkinson's‐associated sialorrhea (n = 2), and oral systemic sclerosis (n = 1) were identified. Most (n = 15) were developed de novo, one was adapted from a pre‐existing questionnaire. Eleven PROMs demonstrated “very good” analysis of internal consistency per COSMIN criteria, and 10 included test–retest data. Regarding content validity, four PROMs were developed with both patient and physician input, but none were rated as “adequate.” All included comparisons against other questionnaires (n = 7), salivary flow rate (n = 9), and/or healthy controls (n = 3). The most rigorously developed PROM, the Xerostomia Inventory, was rated adequate in 6 out of 7 domains.ConclusionsSeveral PROMs evaluate salivary function. The abilties of these PROMs to meet design and validation standards were variable, with notable limitations in content validity for all tools. New and updated PROMs assessing obstructive and inflammatory salivary symptoms should  utilize patient and provider input.Level of EvidenceN/A Laryngoscope, 133:1796–1805, 2023

Funder

University of California, San Francisco

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3