Changes in otolaryngology application requirements and match outcomes: Are we doing any better?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Changes in otolaryngology application requirements and match outcomes: Are we doing any better?

Published:2022-10-02 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2095-8811
Container-title:World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:World j. otorhinolaryngol.-head neck surg.

Author:

De Ravin Emma¹^ORCID,Frost Ariel S.²,Godse Neal R.²,Shaffer Amber D.³,Jabbour Noel³⁴,Schaitkin Barry M.⁴,Newman Jason⁵⁶,Mady Leila J.⁷⁸

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery University of Pennsylvania Health System Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Head and Neck Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

3. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Otolaryngology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA

6. MUSC Hollings Cancer Center Charleston South Carolina USA

7. Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

8. Cancer Risk and Control Program of Excellence Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wjo2.79

Reference33 articles.

1. Reforming the Match Process—Early Decision Plans and the Case for a Consortia Match

2. State of the Otolaryngology Match: Has Competition Increased since the Early Match?

3. The National Resident Matching Program. Charting outcomes in the match: senior students of U.S. Medical Schools; 2020. Accessed November 12 2021.https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Charting-Outcomes-in-the-Match-2020_MD-Senior_final.pdf

4. Increasing Competitiveness for an Otolaryngology Residency

5. The State of the Otolaryngology Match: A Review of Applicant Trends, “Impossible” Qualifications, and Implications