Comparison of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in category IIIB chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A randomized prospective trial

Author:

Sevim Mehmet1ORCID,Alkiş Okan1ORCID,Kartal İbrahim Güven1ORCID,Kazan Huseyin Ozgur1ORCID,İvelik Halil İbrahim1ORCID,Aras Bekir1ORCID,Kabay Şahin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine Kutahya Health Sciences University Kütahya Turkey

2. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine Altinbas University Istanbul Turkey

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a heterogenous condition that impacts the Quality of life severely, and it has multimodal complex treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two well‐described neuromodulation therapies, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of category IIIB CP/CPPS.MethodsThis study was designed as a randomized prospective clinical trial. We randomized category IIIB CP/CPPS patients into two treatment groups as TTNS and PTNS groups. Category IIIB CP/CPPS was diagnosed by two or four‐glass Meares‐Stamey test. All patients included in our study were antibiotic/anti‐inflammatory resistant. Transcutaneous and percutaneous treatments were applied 30 min sessions for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated by Turkish‐validated National Health Institute Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH‐CPSI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) initially and after treatment. Treatment success was evaluated within each group and also compared with each other.ResultsA total of 38 patients in the TTNS group and 42 patients in the PTNS group were included in the final analysis. The mean VAS scores of the TTNS group were lower than the PTNS group initially (7.11 and 7.43, respectively), (p = 0.03). The pretreatment NIH‐CPSI scores were similar between groups (p = 0.07). VAS scores, total NIH‐CPSI, NIH‐CPSI micturation, NIH‐CPSI pain, and NIH‐CPSI QoL scores decreased significantly at the end of the treatment in both groups. We found a significantly higher VAS and NIH‐CPSI scores decrease in the PTNS group compared to the TTNS group (p < 0.01).ConclusionBoth PTNS and TTNS are effective treatment methods in category IIIB CP/CPPS. Comparing the two methods, PTNS provided a higher level of improvement in terms of pain and quality of life.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3