Quantitative Time‐of‐Flight Head Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Cerebrovascular Disease

Author:

Koktzoglou Ioannis12ORCID,Ozturk Onural13,Walker Matthew T.12,Ankenbrandt William J.12,Ong Archie L.24,Ares William J.25,Gil Fulvio R.24,Bulwa Zachary B.24,Edelman Robert R.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology Endeavor Health Evanston Illinois USA

2. University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA

3. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA

4. Department of Neurology Endeavor Health Evanston Illinois USA

5. Department of Neurosurgery Endeavor Health Evanston Illinois USA

Abstract

BackgroundStandard Cartesian time‐of‐flight (TOF) head magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is routinely used to evaluate the intracranial arteries, but does not provide quantitative hemodynamic information that is useful for patient risk stratification as well as for monitoring treatment and tracking changes in blood flow over time. Quantitative TOF (qTOF) MRA represents a new and efficient method for simultaneous evaluating the intracranial arteries and quantifying blood flow velocity, but it has not yet been evaluated in patients with cerebrovascular disease.PurposeTo evaluate qTOF for simultaneously evaluating the intracranial arteries and quantifying intracranial blood flow velocity in patients with cerebrovascular disease, without the need for a phase contrast (PC) scan.Study TypeProspective.SubjectsTwenty‐four patients (18 female, 6 male) with cerebrovascular disease.Field Strength/SequencesHead MRA at 3 T using gradient‐echo 3D qTOF, standard Cartesian TOF, and PC protocols.AssessmentThree independent readers assessed arterial image quality using a 4‐point scale (1: non‐diagnostic, 4: excellent) and artifact presence. Total and component flow velocities obtained with qTOF and PC were measured.Statistical TestsWilcoxon signed‐rank tests, Gwet's AC2, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for absolute agreement, Bland–Altman analyses, tests of equal proportions. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsAveraged across readers and compared to standard Cartesian TOF, qTOF significantly improved overall arterial image quality (3.8 ± 0.2 vs. 3.6 ± 0.5), image quality at locations of pathology (3.7 ± 0.5 vs. 3.4 ± 0.7), and increased the proportion of evaluations rated without artifacts (63.9% [46/72] vs. 37.5% [27/72]). qTOF significantly agreed with PC for total flow velocity (ICC = 0.71) and component flow velocity (ICC = 0.89).Data ConclusionqTOF angiography of the head matched or improved upon the image quality of standard Cartesian TOF, reduced image artifacts, and provided quantitative hemodynamic data, without the need for a PC scan.Evidence Level2Technical EfficacyStage 2

Funder

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3