Diffusion‐Weighted MRI‐Based Virtual Elastography and Shear‐Wave Elastography for the Assessment of Breast Lesions

Author:

Sun Kun1,Zhu Ying2,Chai Weimin1,Zhu Hong1,Fu Caixia3,Zhan Weiwei2,Yan Fuhua1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China

2. Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China

3. Application development, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd Shenzhen China

Abstract

BackgroundDiffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI)‐based virtual MR elastography (DWI‐vMRE) in the assessment of breast lesions is still in the research stage.PurposeTo investigate the usefulness of elasticity values on DWI‐vMRE in the evaluation of breast lesions, and the correlation with the values calculated from shear‐wave elastography (SWE).Study TypeProspective.Population/Subjects153 patients (mean age ± standard deviation: 55 ± 12 years) with 153 pathological confirmed breast lesions (24 benign and 129 malignant lesions).Field Strength/Sequence1.5‐T MRI, multi‐b readout segmented echo planar imaging (b‐values of 0, 200, 800, and 1000 sec/mm2).AssessmentFor DWI‐vMRE assessment, lesions were manually segmented using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC0–1000) map, then the region of interests were copied to the map of shifted‐ADC (sADC200–800, sADC 200–1500). For SWE assessment, the shear modulus of the lesions was measured by US elastic modulus (μUSE). Intraclass/interclass kappa coefficients were calculated to measure the consistency.Statistical TestsPearson's correlation was used to assess the relationship between sADC and μUSE. A receiver operating characteristic analysis with the area under the curve (AUC) was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between benign and malignant breast lesions of sADC and μUSE. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThere were significant differences between benign and malignant breast lesions of μUSE (24.17 ± 10.64 vs. 37.20 ± 12.61), sADC200–800 (1.38 ± 0.31 vs. 0.97 ± 0.18 × 10−3 mm2/sec), and sADC200–1500 (1.14 ± 0.30 vs. 0.78 ± 0.13 × 10−3 mm2/sec). In all breast lesions, a moderate but significant correlation was observed between μUSE and sADC200–800/sADC200–1500 (r = −0.49/−0.44). AUC values to differentiate benign from malignant lesions were as follows: μUSE, 0.78; sADC200–800, 0.89; sADC200–1500, 0.89.Data ConclusionsBoth SWE and DWI‐vMRE could be used for the differentiation of benign versus malignant breast lesions. Furthermore, DWI‐vMRE with the use of sADC show relatively higher AUC values than SWE.Level of Evidence4Technical EfficacyStage 2

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3