Relative Mediastinal Displacement Index (RMDI): A Prenatal MRI Indicator of Adverse Events in Fetuses With Isolated Left Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Author:

Wu Fan1,Chen Yonghao2,Zhang Xin2,Li Yuchao2,Chen Zhaoji2,Liu Zhenqing1,Dai Wangchun1,Yang Chaoxiang3,Liu Hongsheng1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health Guangzhou China

2. Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou China

3. Department of Radiology Guangdong Women and Children Hospital Guangzhou China

Abstract

BackgroundExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), has partly improved congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) outcomes, yet the overall morbidity and mortality remain high. Existing prenatal indicators for CDH fetuses are operator‐dependent, time‐consuming, or less accurate, a new simple and accurate indicator to indicate adverse events in CDH patients is needed.PurposeTo propose and assess the association of a new MRI parameter, the relative mediastinal displacement index (RMDI), with adverse events including in‐hospital deaths or the need for ECMO in fetuses with isolated left CDH (iLCDH).Study TypeRetrospective analysis.SubjectsOne hundred thirty‐nine fetuses were included in the iLCDH group (24 with adverse events and 115 without) and 257 fetuses were included in the control group from two centers in Guangzhou.Field Strength/Sequence3.0 T, T2WI‐TRUFI; 1.5 T, T2WI‐FIESTA.AssessmentThree operators independently measured the , , and DH on the axial images. The calculation formula of the RMDI was ( + )/DH.Statistical TestsThe independent sample t test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi‐square test, Chi‐square test continuity correction, Fisher's test, linear regression analysis, logistic regression analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and Delong test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThe RMDI did not change with gestational age in the iLCDH group (with [P = 0.189] and without [P = 0.567] adverse events) and the control group (P = 0.876). There were significant differences in RMDI between the iLCDH group (0.89 [0.65, 1.00]) and the control group (−0.23 [−0.34, −0.16]). In the iLCDH group, RMDI was the only indicator left for indicating adverse events, and the best cutoff value was 1.105. Moreover, there was a significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the RMDI (AUC = 0.900) and MSA (AUC = 0.820), LHR (AUC = 0.753), o/e LHR (AUC = 0.709), and o/e TFLV (AUC = 0.728), respectively.Data ConclusionThe RMDI is expected to be a simple and accurate tool for indicating adverse events in fetuses with iLCDH.Evidence Level4Technical EfficacyStage 1

Funder

Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3