Patient‐reported outcome measures for dysphagia in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and appraisal of content validity and internal structure

Author:

Manduchi Beatrice123ORCID,Che Zhiyao123,Ringash Jolie G.45,Fitch Margaret I.6,Howell Doris78,Martino Rosemary12359ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Rehabilitation Sciences Institute University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Department of Speech‐Language Pathology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

3. The Swallowing Lab University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

5. Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

7. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

8. Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

9. Krembil Research Institute University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractDysphagia is a major head and neck cancer (HNC) issue. Dysphagia‐related patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are critical for patient‐centred assessment and intervention tailoring. This systematic review aimed to derive a comprehensive inventory of HNC dysphagia PROMs and appraise their content validity and internal structure. Six electronic databases were searched to February 2023 for studies detailing PROM content validity or internal structure. Eligible PROMs were those developed or validated for HNC, with ≥20% of items related to swallowing. Two independent raters screened citations and full‐text articles. Critical appraisal followed COSMIN guidelines. Overall, 114 studies were included, yielding 39 PROMs (17 dysphagia‐specific and 22 generic). Of included studies, 33 addressed PROM content validity and 78 internal structure. Of all PROMs, only the SOAL met COSMIN standards for both sufficient content validity and internal structure. Notably, the development of 18 PROMs predated the publication of COSMIN standards. In conclusion, this review identified 39 PROMs addressing dysphagia in HNC, of which only one met COSMIN quality criteria. Given that half of PROMs were developed prior to COSMIN guidelines, future application of current standards is needed to establish their psychometric quality.

Funder

Peterborough K. M. Hunter Charitable Foundation

Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Trust in Cryptocurrency Payments;Journal of Organizational and End User Computing;2024-08-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3