Systematic review on the anxiolytic and hypnotic effects of flower extracts in in vivo pre‐clinical studies published from 2010 to 2020

Author:

Meneses Constanza1,Valdes‐Gonzalez Marisela1ORCID,Garrido‐Suárez Barbara B.2ORCID,Garrido Gabino1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas Universidad Católica del Norte Antofagasta Chile

2. Departamento de Farmacología Instituto de Ciencias del Mar La Habana Cuba

Abstract

AbstractAnxiety disorders are prevalent conditions in the world population, whose standard approaches include pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and combinations of these interventions. Different classes of psychopharmaceuticals are recommended as the first line of drugs to treat these disorders, which can have several adverse effects, treatment resistance, dependence, and drug–drug interactions making it necessary to search for new therapeutic agents. In particular, diazepam (DZP), a prototype drug from the group of benzodiazepines, has been commonly used and evaluated for its efficacy and safety in different anxiety disorders in clinical trials. DZP is also the most widely used reference standard in in vivo pharmacological assays of natural compounds. However, translating the results obtained in different rodent species and physiological anxiety tests instead of psychopathological animal models that can be of clinical application remains challenging. A systematic review of scientific articles published between 2010 and 2020 that included in vivo pre‐clinical tests to define the anxiolytic, sedative and/or hypnotic effect of flower extracts is proposed. PRISMA and Rayyan were used for the selection of studies using four databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and QInsight), using the keywords: “Animals,” “Anxiolytic,” “Diazepam,” “Elevated Plus Maze,” “Flower Extracts,” “Insomnia,” “In vivo,” “Mice,” “Open Field Test,” “Pre clinical” and “Sedative.” The characteristics of anxiety studies in animal models, other studies related to locomotor activity, and the hypnotic effect of the extracts were compiled. Twenty‐four articles were included, 21 of them performed the animal model of anxiety‐like behavior of the elevated plus maze, seven the open field test, and six the light–dark box test. The locomotor activity was evaluated in 10 studies after the administration of the extracts to the animals to define their sedative effect, where only one defined that the extract (Matricaria chamomilla) had a sedative effect. The plants declared with this type of activity were Achyranthes aspera, Alcea aucheri, Brassica nigra, Cananga odorata, Carthamus tinctorius, Chrysanthemum indicum, Citrus aurantium, Couroupita guianensis, Echium amoenum, Erythrina berteroana, Gardenia jasminoides, Hibiscus tilliaceus, Lavandula officinalis, Lawsonia inermis, Matricaria chamomilla, Melia azedarach, Nerium oleander, Passiflora incarnata, Plumeria rubra, Salix aegyptiaca, Syzygium aromaticum, Tagetes erecta, Tilia americana. Although this review showed that some flower extracts have an anxiolytic effect as effective as diazepam, their therapeutic utility in anxiety disorders remains to be extensively demonstrated. Hence, more reliable and predictive behavioral tests and appropriate strategies for the experimental designs are needed to obtain more conclusive evidence with clinical significance.

Funder

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology

Reference111 articles.

1. Do we need plant food supplements? A critical examination of quality, safety, efficacy, and necessity for a new regulatory framework;Abdel‐Tawab M.;Planta Medica,2018

2. HPLC/MS analysis and anxiolytic-like effect of quercetin and kaempferol flavonoids from Tilia americana var. mexicana

3. Passionflower in the treatment of generalized anxiety: a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial with oxazepam

4. Sedative and hypnotic activities of the methanolic and aqueous extracts of Lavandula officinalis from Morocco [published correction appears in advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences, 2020 Nov 12; 2020:5695093];Alnamer R.;Advances in Pharmacological Sciences,2012

5. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3