Two‐ versus three‐field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of early and late results-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Two‐ versus three‐field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of early and late results

Published:2022-06-11 Issue:1 Volume:126 Page:76-89
ISSN:0022-4790
Container-title:Journal of Surgical Oncology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Surgical Oncology

Author:

Datrino Letícia Nogueira¹^ORCID,Orlandini Marina Feliciano¹^ORCID,Serafim Maria Carolina Andrade¹,dos Santos Clara Lucato¹^ORCID,Modesto Victoria Andrade¹,Tavares Guilherme¹^ORCID,Tristão Luca Schiliró¹^ORCID,Bernardo Wanderley M.¹,Tustumi Francisco¹²³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Evidence‐Based Medicine Centro Universitário Lusíada Santos Brazil

2. Department of Gastroenterology Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

3. Department of Surgery Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to estimate whether prophylactic cervical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer influences the short‐ and long‐term results through a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis. Twenty‐eight articles were selected in this systematic review, encompassing 9180 patients. Prophylactic neck lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer should be performed with caution, as it is associated with worse short‐term results compared to traditional two‐field lymphadenectomy and does not improve long‐term survival.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oncology,General Medicine,Surgery

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jso.26857

Reference46 articles.

1. Prognostic factors in esophageal cancer treated with curative intent

2. EVALUATION OF LYMPHATIC SPREAD, VISCERAL METASTASIS AND TUMORAL LOCAL INVASION IN ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMAS

3. The Role of Lymphadenectomy in Esophageal Cancer

4. Significance of Extended Systemic Lymph Node Dissection for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma in Japan

5. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Short-term outcomes of three- and two-field lymphadenectomy with minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis;Translational Cancer Research;2024-07

2. Effect of cervical paraesophageal lymph node metastasis versus supraclavicular lymph node metastasis on the overall survival of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an observational study;Annals of Medicine & Surgery;2024-03-18

3. Equivalent prognosis with no lymph node metastasis to pathological complete remission in patients with localized advanced esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by curative surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study;Journal of Thoracic Disease;2024-01

4. Current Status of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer;Traditional Chinese Medicine;2024

5. A novel technique for lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study;BMC Surgery;2023-11-21