Factors influencing agitation, de‐escalation, and physical restraint at a children's hospital

Author:

Dalton Evan M.123ORCID,Worsley Diana2,Krass Polina234,Kovacs Brian5,Raymond Kathleen5,Feudtner Chris1236,Shea Judy A.378,Doupnik Stephanie K.1236ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Pediatrics The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Clinical Futures and PolicyLab The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Division of Emergency Medicine The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Nursing and Clinical Care Services The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

6. Department of Pediatrics The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

7. Department of Medicine The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

8. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundChildren hospitalized in medical hospitals are at risk of agitation. Physical restraint may be used to maintain patient and staff safety during de‐escalation, but physical restraint use is associated with physical and psychological adverse events.ObjectiveWe sought to better understand which work system factors help clinicians prevent patient agitation, improve de‐escalation, and avoid physical restraint.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe used directed content analysis to extend the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to clinicians working with children at risk for agitation at a freestanding children's hospital.Intervention, Main Outcome, and MeasuresWe conducted semistructured interviews to examine how five clinician work system factors affected patient agitation, de‐escalation, and restraint: person, environment, tasks, technology and tools, and organization. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed until saturation.ResultsForty clinicians participated in this study, including 21 nurses, 15 psychiatric technicians, 2 pediatric physicians, 1 psychologist, and 1 behavior analyst. Work system factors that contributed to patient agitation were medical tasks like vital signs and the hospital environment including bright lights and neighboring patients' noises. Supports that helped clinicians de‐escalate patients included adequate staffing and accessible toys and activities. Participants indicated that organizational factors were integral to team de‐escalation, drawing connections between units' teamwork and communication cultures and their likelihood of successful de‐escalation without the use of physical restraint.ConclusionClinicians perceived that medical tasks, hospital environmental factors, clinician attributes, and team communication influenced patients' agitation, de‐escalation, and physical restraint. These work system factors provide opportunities for future multi‐disciplinary interventions to reduce physical restraint use.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Assessment and Diagnosis,Care Planning,Health Policy,Fundamentals and skills,General Medicine,Leadership and Management

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3