Variation in pancreatoduodenectomy as delivered in two national audits

Author:

Mackay T M1ORCID,Wellner U F2ORCID,van Rijssen L B1,Stoop T F1,Busch O R1,Groot Koerkamp B3ORCID,Bausch D2,Petrova E2,Besselink M G1,Keck T2,van Santvoort H C45,Molenaar I Q45,Kok N6,Festen S7,van Eijck C H J8,Bonsing B A9,Erdmann J9,de Hingh I10,Buhr H J11,Klinger C12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2. German Society for General and Visceral Surgery StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

3. Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

4. Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein

5. University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht

6. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam

7. OLVG, Amsterdam

8. Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam

9. Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden

10. Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven

11. DGAV Secretary

12. DGAV IT officer

Abstract

Abstract Background Nationwide audits facilitate quality and outcome assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy. Differences may exist between countries but studies comparing nationwide outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy based on audits are lacking. This study aimed to compare the German and Dutch audits for external data validation. Methods Anonymized data from patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy between 2014 and 2016 were extracted from the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery StuDoQ|Pancreas and Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, and compared using descriptive statistics. Univariable and multivariable risk analyses were undertaken. Results Overall, 4495 patients were included, 2489 in Germany and 2006 in the Netherlands. Adenocarcinoma was a more frequent indication for pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands. German patients had worse ASA fitness grades, but Dutch patients had more pulmonary co-morbidity. Dutch patients underwent more minimally invasive surgery and venous resections, but fewer multivisceral resections. No difference was found in rates of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula, grade C postpancreatectomy haemorrhage and in-hospital mortality. There was more centralization in the Netherlands (1·3 versus 13·3 per cent of pancreatoduodenectomies in very low-volume centres; P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, both hospital stay (difference 2·49 (95 per cent c.i. 1·18 to 3·80) days) and risk of reoperation (odds ratio (OR) 1·55, 95 per cent c.i. 1·22 to 1·97) were higher in the German audit, whereas risk of postoperative pneumonia (OR 0·57, 0·37 to 0·88) and readmission (OR 0·38, 0·30 to 0·49) were lower. Several baseline and surgical characteristics, including hospital volume, but not country, predicted mortality. Conclusion This comparison of the German and Dutch audits showed variation in case mix, surgical technique and centralization for pancreatoduodenectomy, but no difference in mortality and pancreas-specific complications.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3