Surgical accuracy of image‐free versus image‐based robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty

Author:

Yee Dennis King‐Hang1ORCID,Ng Jonathan Patrick2,Lau Cyrus Tsun‐Kit2ORCID,Ho Kevin Ki‐Wai23,Man Gene Chi‐Wai4,Chu Vikki Wing‐Shan1,Choi Tsz Lung1,Lam Gloria Yan Ting1,Ong Michael Tim‐Yun23,Yung Patrick Shu‐Hang23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital Tai Po Hong Kong

2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Prince of Wales Hospital Shatin Hong Kong

3. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong

4. Office of Research and Knowledge Transfer Services The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThis study investigated the accuracy in achieving proper lower limb alignment and component positions after total knee replacement (TKR) with image‐free and image‐based robotic‐assisted TKR.MethodsA total of 129 patients (166 knees) suffering from end‐stage knee arthritis who underwent TKA operated by robotic‐assisted surgery between the years 2018 and mid‐2021 were recruited. Radiological outcomes were compared between image‐free and image‐based robotic‐assisted surgical systems.ResultsThere were significant differences between the two robotic systems when comparing the mean planned component alignment and the mean measured alignment on radiographs, in which the image‐free robotic‐assisted system was more varus, whereas the image‐based robotic‐assisted system was more valgus for both the mean femoral and tibial component coronal alignment (p < 0.001). For tibial component sagittal alignment, the image‐based group had a larger deviation from the planned posterior slope (p < 0.001).ConclusionImage‐free and image‐based robotic assisted TKR had differing accuracy in femoral and tibial alignment.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Biophysics,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3