The unimodal intransitivity–fertility relationship is not mediated by demographic trade‐offs in a subtropical forest

Abstract

AbstractIntransitive competition has long been acknowledged as a potential mechanism favoring species coexistence. However, its prevalence, variance along environmental gradients, and possible underlying mechanisms (trade‐offs) in plant communities (especially in forests) has seldom been examined. A recently developed “reverse‐engineering” approach based on Markov Chain allowed us to estimate the competitive transition matrices and competitive intransitivity from observational abundance data. Using this approach, we estimated competitive intransitivity of five dominant species in a subtropical forest and then related it to soil fertility (soil organic matter and soil pH) and demographic trade‐offs (growth–survival and stature–recruitment trade‐offs). In our forest plot, intransitive competition was common among the dominant species and peaked at the intermediate level of soil organic matter. Neither the growth–survival trade‐off nor the stature–recruitment trade‐off was positively related to competitive intransitivity. Our study for the first time empirically supported the unimodal intransitivity–fertility relationship in forests, which, however, was not mediated by the two demographic trade‐offs in our plot.