Prospective randomized trial using cost–utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease

Abstract

Abstract Background This randomized controlled trial compared the cost–utility of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy with that for conventional management of newly diagnosed acute gallbladder disease. Methods Adults admitted to hospital with a first episode of biliary colic or acute cholecystitis were randomized to an early intervention group (36 patients, operation within 72 h of admission) or a conventional group (36, elective cholecystectomy 3 months later). Costs were measured from a National Health Service and societal perspective. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains were calculated 1 month after surgery. Results The mean(s.d.) total costs of care were £5911(2445) for the early group and £6132(3244) for the conventional group (P = 0·928), Mean(s.d.) societal costs were £1322(1402) and £1461(1532) for the early and conventional groups respectively (P = 0·732). Visual analogue scale scores of health were 72·94 versus 84·63 (P = 0·012) and the mean(s.d.) QALY gain was 0·85(0·26) versus 0·93(0·13) respectively (P = 0·262). The incremental cost per additional QALY gained favoured conventional management at a cost of £3810 per QALY gained. Conclusion In this pragmatic trial, the cost–utilities of both the early and conventional approaches were similar, but the incremental cost per additional QALY gained favoured conventional management. Registration number: ISRCTN81663421 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).