Affiliation:
1. EDF Research & Developement SINCLAIR AI Laboratory Chatou France
2. Laboratoire de Probabilité, Statistique et Modélisation Sorbonne Université Paris France
Abstract
SummaryThe article by Tian et al. (Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. Ind. 2023) takes an interesting look at the use of non‐informative priors adapted to several censoring processes, which are common in reliability. It proposes a continuum of modelling approaches that go as far as defining weakly informative priors to overcome the well‐known shortcomings of frequentist approaches to problems involving highly censored samples. In this commentary, I make some critical remarks and propose to link this work to a more generic vision of what could be a relevant Bayesian elicitation in reliability, taking advantage of recent theoretical and applied advances. Through tools like approximate posterior priors and prior equivalent sample sizes, and by illustrating them with simple reliability models, I suggest methodological avenues to formalize the elicitation of informative priors in a auditable, defensible way. By allowing a clear modulation of subjective information, this might respond to the authors' primary concern of constructing weakly informative priors and to a more general concern for precaution in Bayesian reliability.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting,Modeling and Simulation
Reference62 articles.
1. Specifying prior distributions in reliability applications;Tian Q;Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind,2023
2. Moving beyond noninformative priors: why and how to choose weakly informative priors in Bayesian analyses
3. GelmanA VehtariA SimpsonD et al.Bayesian Workflow. arXiv:2011.01808.2020.
4. Visualization in Bayesian workflow;Gabry J;Jrss A,2019
5. Holes in Bayesian statistics
*
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献