Similarities and differences of bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from acute myeloid leukemia patients in terms of cellular heterogeneity and ex‐vivo drug sensitivity

Author:

Caliskan Gulser1,Pawitan Yudi1,Vu Trung Nghia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBone marrow (BM) evaluation is the de facto standard for diagnosis, molecular analysis, risk stratification, and therapy response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but in patients with a high number of circulating blast cells, the peripheral blood (PB) sample could provide similar information as BM. However, there is no large‐scale molecular study comparing the two specimens in terms of their gene expression profiles, cellular heterogeneities, and ex‐vivo drug sensitivity.MethodologyWe used (i) the BEAT‐AML cohort each with detailed molecular data; (ii) cell‐type deconvolution to estimate leukemic and immune cell proportions between specimen types; (iii) differential expression (DE) and drug‐cell type association analysis; and (iv) logistic regression models to assess the association between induction therapy response, cell‐type composition and first‐line drug treatment.ResultsResults: We identified 207 patients having BM and 116 patients having PB samples. There was a total of 1271 DE genes (false discovery rate < 0.05) between BM and PB; the top enriched pathways in terms of DE genes belong to the immune system pathways. Aggregated ex‐vivo drug response profiles from the two specimens were largely similar, as were the cellular components, except for the GMP‐like cell type (17% in BM vs. 5% in PB, p‐value = 2 × 10−7). Among the specimen‐specific results, the GMP‐like subtype was associated with multiple drug resistance in BM and the ProMono‐like subtype in PB. Several cell types were associated with the response to induction therapy, but the impact of specimen type on the interaction of cell type and cytarabine‐associated induction therapy was not statistically significant for most cell types.ResultsConclusions: Even though there are molecular and cellular differences between BM and PB samples, they show many similarities in ex‐vivo drug response profiles, indicating the clinical utility of the substantially less‐invasive PB samples.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3