Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A risk stratified analysis of the NSQIP database

Author:

Radomski Shannon N.1ORCID,Chen Sophia Y.1ORCID,Stem Miloslawa1ORCID,Done Joy Z.1,Efron Jonathan E.1,Safar Bashar2,Atallah Chady2

Affiliation:

1. Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

2. Department of Surgery New York University New York City New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesOver 25% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Controversy exists over the surgical management of these patients. This study aims to investigate the safety of a simultaneous surgical approach by stratifying patients based on procedure risk and operative approach.MethodsUsing ACS‐NSQIP (2016–2020), patients with CRC who underwent isolated colorectal, isolated hepatic, or simultaneous resections were identified. Colorectal and hepatic procedures were stratified by morbidity risk (high vs. low) and operative approach (open vs. minimally invasive). Thirty‐day overall morbidity was compared between risk matched isolated and simultaneous resection groups.ResultsA total of 65 417 patients were identified, with 1550 (2.4%) undergoing simultaneous resections. A total of 1207 (77.9%) underwent a low‐risk colorectal and low‐risk liver resection. On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in overall morbidity between patients who had a simultaneous open high‐risk colorectal/low‐risk hepatic procedure compared to patients who had an isolated open high‐risk colorectal procedure (odds ratio: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.94–1.50; p = 0.148). All other combinations of simultaneous procedures had statistically significant higher rates of morbidity than the isolated group.ConclusionsSimultaneous resection of colorectal and synchronous CRLM is associated with an increased risk of morbidity in most circumstances in a risk stratified analysis, although rates of readmission and reoperation were not increased. Minimally invasive surgical approaches may significantly mitigate this morbidity.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oncology,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3