Effect of patient specificity on predicting knee cartilage degeneration in obese adults: Musculoskeletal finite‐element modeling of data from the CAROT trial

Author:

Orozco Gustavo A.1ORCID,Stenroth Lauri23ORCID,Esrafilian Amir2ORCID,Tanska Petri2ORCID,Mononen Mika E.2ORCID,Henriksen Marius4,Alkjær Tine34ORCID,Korhonen Rami K.2ORCID,Isaksson Hanna1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Engineering Lund University Lund Sweden

2. Department of Technical Physics University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland

3. Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. The Parker Institute Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractObesity is a known risk factor for development of osteoarthritis (OA). Numerical tools like finite‐element (FE) models combined with degenerative algorithms have been developed to understand the interplay between OA and obesity. In this study, we aimed to predict knee cartilage degeneration in a cohort of obese adults to investigate the importance of patient‐specific information on degeneration predictions. We used a validated FE modeling approach and three different age‐dependent functions (step‐wise, exponential, and linear) to simulate cartilage degradation under overloading in the knee joint. Gait motion analysis and magnetic resonance imaging data from 115 obese individuals with knee OA were used for musculoskeletal and FE modeling. Cartilage degeneration predictions were contrasted with Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) and Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score (BLOKS) grades. The findings show that overall, the similarities between numerical predictions and clinical measures were better for the medial (average area under the curve (AUC) = 0.62) compared to the lateral compartment (average AUC = 0.52) of the knee. Classification results for KL grades, full patient‐specific models and patient‐specific geometry with generic gait data showed higher AUC values (AUC = 0.71 and AUC = 0.68, respectively) compared to generic geometry and patient‐specific gait (AUC = 0.48). For BLOKS grades, AUC values for both full patient‐specific models and for patient‐specific geometry with generic gait locomotion were higher (AUC  = 0.66 and AUC = 0.64, respectively) compared to when the generic geometry and patient‐specific gait were used (AUC = 0.53). In summary, our study highlights the importance of considering individual information in knee OA prediction. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that personalized gait play a smaller role in the OA prediction and classification capacity than personalized joint geometry.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference50 articles.

1. Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis;Blagojevic M;Osteoarthr Cartil,2010

2. Osteoarthritis, obesity and weight loss: evidence, hypotheses and horizons—a scoping review;Bliddal H;Obes Rev,2014

3. Pathogenesis and clinical management of obesity‐related knee osteoarthritis: impact of mechanical loading;Chen L;J Orthop Transl,2020

4. Musculoskeletal disorders associated with obesity: a biomechanical perspective;Wearing SC;Obes Rev,2006

5. Is there a causal link between knee loading and knee osteoarthritis progression? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of cohort studies and randomised trials;Henriksen M;BMJ Open,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3