Prevalence and outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Rathore Sawai Singh1ORCID,Wint Zario Shai2,Goyal Aman3ORCID,Jeswani Bijay Mukesh4,Farrukh Ameer Mustafa5ORCID,Nieto‐Salazar María Alejandra6ORCID,Thugu Thanmai Reddy7,Erva Snigdha8,Mehmood Raafay9,Toro‐velandia Adriana Carolina610,Aneis Hamam11,Ratnani Sunny12,Al Shyyab Ibrahim Marouf Yasin13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College Jodhpur Rajasthan India

2. All American Institute of Medical Sciences Black River Jamaica

3. Department of Internal Medicine Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital Mumbai India

4. GCS Medical College Hospital & Research Centre Ahmedabad India

5. University of Galway School of Medicine Galway Ireland

6. Juan N. Corpas University Bogotá D.C Colombia

7. Sri Padmavathi Medical College for Women Tirupathi Andhra Pradesh India

8. MNR Medical College and Hospital Sangareddy India

9. First Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

10. Larkin Community Hospital Miami Florida USA

11. Department of Internal Medicine UPMC Mckeesport Pennsylvania USA

12. Saint James School of Medicine The Quarter Anguilla

13. University of Sharjah Sharjah United Arab Emirates

Abstract

AbstractUpper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in COVID‐19 presents challenges in patient management. Existing studies lack comprehensive review due to varied designs, samples, and demographics. A meta‐analysis can provide valuable insights into the incidence, features, and outcomes of UGIB in COVID‐19. A comprehensive literature search was carried out using several databases. We considered all appropriate observational studies from all over the world. Mantel‐Haenszel odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were produced to report the overall effect size using random effect models. Besides, Random effects models were used to calculate the overall pooled prevalence. Funnel plots, Egger regression tests, and Begg‐Mazumdar's rank correlation test were used to appraise publication bias. Data from 21 articles consisting of 26,933 COVID‐19 patients were considered. The pooled estimate of UGIB prevalence in patients admitted with COVID‐19 across studies was 2.10% (95% CI, 1.23–3.13). Similarly, the overall pooled estimate for severity, mortality, and rebleeding in COVID‐19 patients with UGIB was 55% (95% CI, 37.01–72.68), 29% (95% CI, 19.26–40.20) and 12.7% (95% CI, 7.88–18.42) respectively. Further, UGIB in COVID‐19 patients was associated with increased odds of severity (OR = 3.52, 95% CI 1.80–6.88, P = 0.001) and mortality (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.33–3.51, P = 0.002) compared with patients without UGIB. No significant publication bias was evident in the meta‐analysis. The results of our study indicate that UGIB in individuals with COVID‐19 is linked to negative outcomes such as severe illness, higher mortality rates, and an increased risk of re‐bleeding. These findings highlight the significance of identifying UGIB as a significant complication in COVID‐19 cases and emphasise the importance of timely clinical assessment and proper treatment.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3