Affiliation:
1. Institute of Chemical Technology Universität Leipzig Linnéstr. 3 04103 Leipzig Germany
2. Amity Institute of Applied Science Dept. of Chemistry Amity University Sector-125 Noida Uttar Pradesh India
Abstract
AbstractSeveral different evaluation methods (EM) to obtain the band gap energy (Eg) of semiconductors via UV/Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) are used in literature and no clear consensus which EM to use is established. By using P25 as a model semiconductor, evaluating 32 literature sources and our own experiments, we show that the determined Eg energy is heavily influenced by the EM (differences in Eg of up to 0.87 eV). For P25 loaded with CuO even contradictive effects of metal loading on the Eg are observed using different EM. Different phase compositions of TiO2 are also shown to yield EM‐dependent results. This paper thus comprehensively investigates the most common EM on different relevant photocatalyst material classes, illustrates their mathematical and graphical determination, gives recommendations which method to use based on a quantitative indicator and illustrates common pitfalls in determining Eg via UV/Vis DRS.
Subject
Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Analytical Chemistry
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献