Improving Sediment Toxicity Testing for Very Hydrophobic Chemicals: Part 2—Exposure Duration, Upper Limit Test Concentrations, and Distinguishing Actual Toxicity from Physical Effects

Abstract

AbstractSediment toxicity testing with very hydrophobic organic chemicals (VHOCs) is challenging because of the chemicals’ low aqueous solubilities and slow kinetics. The present study presents the results of experiments investigating whether the standard exposure duration of 28 days with benthic invertebrates is sufficient for VHOCs; above which concentrations in sediment VHOCs are present as “free phase,” that is, crystals or non‐aqueous‐phase liquids (NAPLs); and whether it is possible to discriminate between actual VHOC toxicity and physical effects caused by NAPLs through fouling of the test organisms. The results suggest that the standard sediment toxicity test duration is sufficient for obtaining steady‐state VHOC concentrations in Hyalella azteca and Lumbriculus variegatus, provided that spiking and equilibration are performed properly (i.e., no free phase present). Under these conditions, transient (days 3–20) peak‐shaped toxicokinetics were observed, with steady‐state concentrations reached at approximately 28 days. The concentration above which NAPLs are present, the so‐called critical separate phase concentration (CSPC), was determined for several VHOCs by modeling and two experimental methods. Modeling resulted in unrealistic and variable data and therefore should be applied with caution. Experimentally determining CSPCs was successful and yielded values of approximately 1000 (400–2000) mg/kg dry weight, depending on the chemical. Finally, it was demonstrated that distinguishing actual toxicity from physical effects is possible by applying a well‐considered test setup, combining toxicity tests with multiple invertebrates (including Lumbriculus, which serves as a negative control for fouling); a broad test concentration range, preferably up to at least 30 000 mg/kg; and passive sampling to localize the CSPC. Applying this setup, false‐positive effects due to fouling, as well as false‐negative results due to testing at too low concentrations (trying to stay below the CSPC), can be avoided. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:1728–1739. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.