Trends in cancer incidence by socioeconomic deprivation in Germany in 2007 to 2018: An ecological registry‐based study

Author:

Jansen Lina1ORCID,Schwettmann Lars2,Behr Christian3,Eberle Andrea4,Holleczek Bernd5,Justenhoven Christina3,Kajüter Hiltraud6,Manz Kirsi7,Peters Frederik8,Pritzkuleit Ron9,Schmidt‐Pokrzywniak Andrea10,Sirri Eunice11ORCID,Tetzlaff Fabian12,Voigtländer Sven13ORCID,Arndt Volker1

Affiliation:

1. Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden‐Württemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany

2. Division for Health Economics, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg Oldenburg Germany

3. Cancer Registry Rheinland‐Palatinate gGmbH Mainz Germany

4. Bremen Cancer Registry, Leibniz‐Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology: BIPS Bremen Germany

5. Cancer Registry Saarland Saarbrücken Germany

6. Cancer Registry of North Rhine‐Westphalia Bochum Germany

7. Cancer Registry Mecklenburg‐Western Pomerania, Institute for Community Medicine University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany

8. Cancer Registry Hamburg Hamburg Germany

9. Institute for Cancer Epidemiology University Lübeck, Cancer Registry Schleswig‐Holstein Lübeck Germany

10. Clinical Cancer Registry Sachsen‐Anhalt gGmbH Halle Germany

11. Epidemiological Cancer Registry Lower Saxony, Registerstelle Oldenburg Germany

12. Division of Social Determinants of Health, Robert Koch‐Institute Berlin Germany

13. Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority Nürnberg Germany

Abstract

AbstractAge‐standardized cancer incidence has decreased over the last years for many cancer sites in developed countries. Whether these trends led to narrowing or widening socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence is unknown. Using cancer registry data covering 48 million inhabitants in Germany, the ecological association between age‐standardized total and site specific (colorectal, lung, prostate and breast) cancer incidence in 2007 to 2018 and a deprivation index on district level (aggregated to quintiles) was investigated. Incidence in the most and least deprived districts were compared using Poisson models. Average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) and differences in AAPCs between deprivation quintiles were assessed using Joinpoint regression analyses. Age‐standardized incidence decreased strongly between 2007 and 2018 for total cancer and all cancer sites (except female lung cancer), irrespective of the level of deprivation. However, differences in the magnitude of trends across deprivation quintiles resulted in increasing inequalities over time for total cancer, colorectal and lung cancer. For total cancer, the incidence rate ratio between the most and least deprived quintile increased from 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 1.01‐1.12) to 1.23 (1.12‐1.32) in men and from 1.07 (1.01‐1.13) to 1.20 (1.14‐1.26) in women. Largest inequalities were observed for lung cancer with 82% (men) and 88% (women) higher incidence in the most vs the least deprived regions in 2018. The observed increase in inequalities in cancer incidence is in alignment with trends in inequalities in risk factor prevalence and partly utilization of screening. Intervention programs targeted at socioeconomically deprived and urban regions are highly needed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3