Affiliation:
1. Department of Oncology Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (SKCCC), Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA
2. Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
3. Department of Urology James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
4. Division of Human Biology Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
5. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe quinoline‐3‐carboxamide, Tasquinimod (TasQ), is orally active as a maintenance therapy with an on‐target mechanism‐of‐action via allosteric binding to HDAC4. This prevents formation of the HDAC4/NCoR1/HDAC3 complex, disrupting HIF‐1α transcriptional activation and repressing MEF‐2 target genes needed for adaptive survival signaling in the compromised tumor micro environment. In phase 3 clinical testing against metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer(mCRPC), TasQ (1 mg/day) increased time‐to‐progression, but not overall survival.MethodsTasQ analogs were chemically synthesized and tested for activity compared to the parental compound. These included HDAC4 enzymatic assays, qRT‐PCR and western blot analyses of gene and protein expression following treatment, in vitro and in vivo efficacy against multiple prostate cancer models including PDXs, pharmacokinetic analyses,AHR binding and agonist assays, SPR analyses of binding to HDAC4 and NCoR1, RNAseq analysis of in vivo tumors, 3D endothelial sprouting assays, and a targeted kinase screen. Genetic knockout or knockdown controls were used when appropriate.ResultsHere, we document that, on this regimen (1 mg/day), TasQ blood levels are 10‐fold lower than the optimal concentration (≥2 μM) needed for anticancer activity, suggesting higher daily doses are needed. Unfortunately, we also demonstrate that TasQ is an arylhydrocarbon receptor (AHR) agonist, which binds with an EC50 of 1 μM to produce unwanted off‐target side effects. Therefore, we screened a library of TasQ analogsto maximize on‐target versus off‐target activity. Using this approach, we identified ESATA‐20, which has ~10‐fold lower AHR agonism and 5‐fold greater potency against prostate cancer patient‐derived xenografts.ConclusionThis increased therapeuticindex nominates ESATA‐20 as a lead candidate forclinical development as an orally active third generation quinoline‐3‐carboxamide analog thatretains its on‐target ability to disrupt HDAC4/HIF‐1α/MEF‐2‐dependent adaptive survival signaling in the compromisedtumor microenvironment found in mCRPC.
Funder
U.S. Department of Defense
National Institutes of Health
Reference62 articles.
1. The antitumor effects of the quinoline‐3‐carboxamide linomide on Dunning R‐3327 rat prostatic cancers;Ichikawa T;Cancer Res,1992
2. Antiangiogenic effects of the quinoline‐3‐carboxamide linomide;Vukanovic J;Cancer Res,1993
3. Linomide inhibits angiogenesis, growth, metastasis, and macrophage infiltration within rat prostatic cancers;Vukanovic J;Cancer Res,1995
4. Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and the therapeutic ability of linomide against rat prostatic cancers
5. Antiangiogenic treatment with linomide as chemoprevention for prostate, seminal vesicle, and breast carcinogenesis in rodents;Joseph IB;Cancer Res,1996
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献