Physician knowledge, practice patterns, and barriers encountered regarding guideline‐concordant use of bone modifying agents for prostate cancer

Author:

Mitchell Aaron P.12ORCID,Persaud Sonia1,Palyca Paul3,Salner Andrew4,Farooki Azeez5,Ostroff Jamie S.6,Morris Michael J.2,Chimonas Susan1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

2. Department of Medicine, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

3. Lehigh Valley Topper Cancer Institute Lehigh Valley Health Network Allentown Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Radiation Oncology Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute Hartford Connecticut USA

5. Department of Medicine, Division of Subspecialty Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundGuidelines recommend bone‐modifying agents (BMAs) for patients with castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastasis, but not for castrate‐sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). Physicians beliefs and practices regarding BMA therapy are poorly understood.MethodsThis was a qualitative interview study with embedded Likert‐scale elements. Study participants were physicians who treat prostate cancer, located within an academic cancer center or an affiliated community‐based network. Participants were asked about their experiences and practice patterns regarding BMA therapy. Participants used Likert‐scale items to identify the most common barriers to guideline‐concordant BMA use and the most effective potential interventions. Participants were subsequently asked to rank the three most common barriers and the three most effective interventions to reduce underuse (for CRPC) and overuse (for CSPC).ResultsNineteen physicians were invited and 15 participated; one physician did not answer some questions as outside of their practice scope. All were aware of the recommendation for BMAs in CRPC. 14% (2/14) were unaware of the recommendation against BMA use for CSPC; an additional 29% (4/14) believed that BMA use could be appropriate for CSPC depending on the metastatic disease burden. 36% (5/14) were unaware of recommendations for screening and treatment of low bone mineral density. The most common barriers (occurring “often” or “sometimes”) were obtaining dental clearance (11/15) and insufficient clinic time (6/15). The interventions identified as most effective to reduce underuse were dental navigation (11/15) and electronic medical record (EMR)‐based guidance (9/15). The interventions identified as most effective to reduce overuse were peer‐to‐peer education (14/15) and EMR‐based guidance (13/15).ConclusionsAwareness of guideline recommendations for screening and treatment of low bone mineral density and against BMA use for CSPC was good, but not complete. Dental navigation, peer‐to‐peer education, and EMR‐based guidance were preferred intervention strategies to improve guideline‐concordant use.

Funder

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3