The association between beta‐blockers use and prostate cancer mortality: A mini systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Uleri Alessandro12ORCID,Baboudjian Michael3ORCID,Tedde Alessandro4,Rajwa Pawel5ORCID,Pradere Benjamin6,Gallioli Andrea4,Breda Alberto4,Ploussard Guillaume6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Milan Italy

2. Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Milan Italy

3. Department of Urology APHM, North Academic Hospital Marseille France

4. Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert Autonoma University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

5. Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

6. Department of Urology La Croix du Sud Hôpital Quint Fonsegrives France

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPreclinical studies have shown that the sympathetic nervous system is involved in the development of metastases, suggesting a potential antitumor effect of beta‐blockers. These findings sparked a controversy over the past decade regarding the direction of the association between beta‐blocker use and prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. To investigate this association, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis.MethodsThe review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses guidelines to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was PCa mortality in beta‐blocker users versus nonusers, and overall survival was studied as a secondary endpoint. We assessed heterogeneity using the Cochrane Q test and quantified it using I2 values. In the case of heterogeneity (Cochrane Q test p < 0.05 and I2 > 50%), random‐effect models were used to determine the association between beta‐blockers use and survival outcomes.ResultsTen studies met our inclusion criteria and a total of 74,970 patients were included: 26,674 beta‐blocker users and 48,326 nonusers.There was no statistically significant association between beta‐blocker exposure and PCa mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.09; p = 0.61). However, significant heterogeneity was found. Meta‐regression analysis to explain heterogeneity showed no effect of any of the variables assessed (country, percentage of beta‐blocker users, type of beta‐blocker [selective and nonselective], study period, PCa stage and follow‐up duration; all p > 0.05). We found similar results when we restricted the analysis to studies that include only patients with advanced PCa (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.80–1.06; p = 0.24). Similarly, we found no association with overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94–1.10; p = 0.64). Meta‐regression analysis was also performed, but none of the variables assessed explained the observed heterogeneity (all p > 0.05).ConclusionsWe found no association between beta‐blockers use and overall survival or PCa mortality. This meta‐analysis, which includes a considerable population and the most recent literature, provides important data for routine clinical care and patient counseling.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3