Abstract
AbstractCategory change without overt marking is often called conversion or zero‐derivation. In discussing a few landmarks in the research on conversion, this article presents the arguments for and against the idea that conversion is a separate grammatical process, or that it is performed through zero affixes. The empirical evidence supports the idea that, within certain limits, conversion does not exist as a separate process or means to derive words, but rather that it is an epiphenomenon resulting from uncategorized elements in the lexicon that can be freely inserted into syntactic environments that define the category of the inserted element.
Reference62 articles.
1. Functional Structure in Nominals
2. Deriving Color Adjectival Nominalizations;Alexiadou Artemis;Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Univerdade do Porto,2013
3. Allen Margaret Reese.1978. ‘Morphological Investigations’. PhD diss. University of Connecticut.
4. English Word-Formation
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献