Author:
De Clercq Karen,Caha Pavel,Starke Michal,Wyngaerd Guido Vanden
Abstract
AbstractThis entry provides a chronological overview of the treatment of degree morphology in the generative literature from the 1970s until today. Starting out from Ultan's four basic degrees of comparison, it initially widens the scope to consider other types of degree morphology. It then homes in on the expression of the positive, comparative and superlative degrees, and the way these are related to one another. It is shown how the functional superstructure of the adjective became increasingly fine‐grained, with the earliest proposals involving a partitive layer (QP) with a degree determiner (deg) on top of the lexical adjectival core. It is then shown howdegis split up into a comparative headcmprand a superlative headsprlin the work of Bobaljik, which is based on attested and unattested patterns in root suppletion in the triplet positive–comparative–superlative. Nanosyntactic treatments are discussed, which decompose Bobaljik's heads even further, on the basis of evidence from Czech comparatives and Latin superlatives. Finally, the particular position of the positive degree is discussed, in particular its relation to the comparative, both with respect to their morphological marking and their underlying structural and semantic relationship.
Reference61 articles.
1. An Analysis of Japanese‐Speaking Children's Interpretation of Adjectives with Measure Phrases;Arii Tomoe;Linguistic Research,2011
2. Okrajové úseky severovýchodočeské nářeční oblasti z pohledu celočeského (na materiálu korespondenční ankety úJČ);Bachmannová Jarmila;Nas̆e řeč,2007
3. 7. Marking WH-Movement in Afrikaans Hans den Besten
4. Universals in Comparative Morphology
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献