“Bio‐based Plastic? Hm, I've Never Seen It!”—A mixed‐methods investigation into consumer preferences for different packaging material of fresh apples and tomatoes

Author:

Lehberger Mira1ORCID,Kleih Anne‐Katrin1,Sparke Kai1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Fresh Produce Logistics, Professorship for Horticultural Economics Hochschule Geisenheim University Geisenheim Germany

Abstract

AbstractPackaging of fresh fruits and vegetables is standard in many grocery stores. This mixed methods study aims to identify the role packaging plays in consumer choice and what packaging material consumers prefer. We analyzed data from quantitative stated preference experiments with a quota sample of 485 consumers living in Germany. In addition to the experiments, we conducted a qualitative study and analyzed data from 13 consumers who participated in think aloud protocols and responded to open‐ended questions. We analyzed the data from the quantitative and qualitative studies separately and then systematically compared their key findings. Choice‐based conjoint analyses showed that packaging was less important than price and origin in consumers' decisions, but that consumers clearly preferred unpackaged to packaged produce. This is true for both apples, a relatively robust produce, and tomatoes, which are more susceptible to damage. The qualitative research indicated that consumers appreciate the ability to see and choose an unpackaged product, but also see some benefits of packaging, such as the protection of the produce. Overall, we found that by combining qualitative and quantitative insights, we were able to identify overlapping but also distinct facets of consumer preference for fresh produce packaging. Regarding the use of bio‐based plastics for fresh produce, our results indicate that German consumers were not currently inclined to choose this type of packaging, and evidence suggests that they have little knowledge and/or awareness about it. Our findings have implications for researchers, marketing practitioners, packaging manufacturers, and policy makers. [EconLit Citations: D12, Q50].

Publisher

Wiley

Reference38 articles.

1. “Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems”: Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research

2. BLE Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung. (2020). Pressemitteilung: 27 2 kg pro Person: Tomaten weiterhin sehr beliebt [Press release: 27.2 kg per person: Tomatoes still very popular]. Retrieved May 10 2023 from:https://www.ble.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Pressemitteilungen/2020/200702_Tomaten.html

3. BMEL Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. (2020a). Außenhandelsstatistik: Obst und Gemüse [Foreign trade statistics: Fruit and vegetables]. Retrieved May 10 2021 from:https://www.bmel-statistik.de/landwirtschaft/gartenbau/aussenhandel-gartenbauerzeugnisse/obst-und-gemuese/

4. BMEL Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. (2020b).Pro‐Kopf‐Verbrauch von Obst und Gemüse 2018/2019 [Per capita consumption of fruit and vegetables 2018/2019]. Retrieved May 10 2023 from:https://www.bmel-statistik.de/ernaehrung-fischerei/versorgungsbilanzen/obst-gemuese-zitrusfruechte-schalen-und-trockenobst/

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3