Acceptability, feasibility and preliminary effects of an online group psychotherapy intervention for adolescents and young adults with cancer

Author:

Tutelman Perri R.12,Moran Chelsea13,Beattie Sara M.12,Khu Melanie4,Howlett Melissa45,Scheidl Jessica1,Boychuk April1,Silveira Kristen1,Henning Jan‐Willem26,Schulte Fiona S. M.24

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychosocial and Rehabilitation Oncology Tom Baker Cancer Centre Calgary Alberta Canada

2. Department of Oncology University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

3. Substance Use and Concurrent Disorders Program The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre Ottawa Ontario Canada

4. Hematology, Oncology, Transplant Program Alberta Children's Hospital Calgary Alberta Canada

5. Division of Hematology/Oncology Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Department of Medical Oncology Tom Baker Cancer Centre Calgary Alberta Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAdolescents and young adults (AYAs; ages 15–29 years) diagnosed with cancer are increasingly recognized as an oncology population with distinct psychosocial needs. However, few specialized psychosocial interventions for AYAs currently exist. This study reports on the development of a novel group‐based psychotherapy intervention to address the psychosocial needs of AYAs. The objective was to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effects of the intervention.MethodsThe manualized group psychotherapy program is delivered virtually over an 8‐week period by registered psychologists. Four groups (n = 5–11 AYAs per group) with a total of N = 33 participants (Mage = 20.97 years, SD = 3.68, range = 15–29 years, 76% women) were conducted. Recruitment and retention data assessed intervention feasibility. Patient‐reported psychosocial outcomes were measured at baseline and immediately following the intervention to assess preliminary effects. Acceptability was assessed following the intervention using a self‐report measure of participant satisfaction.ResultsOverall, the completion rate of the intervention was 85% (n = 28). All participants “strongly agreed” (88%) or “agreed” (13%) that they were satisfied with the group. Meeting, sharing experiences, and expressing feelings with other AYAs were identified as the most helpful aspects. Participants reported significant improvements in emotional (p < 0.05) and functional (p < 0.01) quality of life from baseline to immediately post‐intervention with medium effect sizes (d = 0.58–0.70).ConclusionsFindings suggest that the intervention is feasible, acceptable, and shows promise for improving psychosocial outcomes for AYAs. Further research will refine the intervention and establish efficacy in a randomized trial.

Funder

Alberta Cancer Foundation

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Killam Trusts

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3