Factors influencing survival after resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

Author:

Vogelsang H1,Haas S1,Hierholzer C1,Berger U1,Siewert J R1,Präuer H1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background Selection of patients for resection of lung metastases from colorectal cancer is problematic. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically relevant prognostic factors and to define a subgroup of patients who would most benefit from such surgery. Patients Seventy-five patients (median age 58 (range 33–82) years) with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer underwent 104 R0 lung resections. Median follow-up was 33 (range 4–116) months. Patients who had no evidence of recurrent extrathoracic disease, no more than three metastases on either side, lobectomy as the maximal surgical procedure, and adequate cardiorespiratory function were eligible for surgery. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression, and classification and regression tree subgroup analyses were performed. Results Overall median survival was 33 months, with 3- and 5-year survival rates of 47 and 27 per cent respectively. Size of metastases (relative risk (RR) 2·6) and extent of resection (RR 0·4) were identified as independent prognostic factors. Primary tumour stage was significant in univariate analysis. Subgroup analysis defined two statistically relevant prognostic groups: patients with a maximum metastasis size of 3·75 cm or less with a disease-free interval of more than 10 months and patients with larger metastases and a shorter disease-free interval. Median survival and 5-year survival were 45 months and 39 per cent in the former group, and 24 months and less than 11 per cent in the latter. Conclusion Subgroup analysis provided criteria for the selection of patients for R0 resection of lung metastases from colorectal cancer and differentiated between those at high or low risk of early tumour progression; the latter patients would benefit most from surgery.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 114 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3