Affiliation:
1. Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
Abstract
Abstract
The ‘perineometer’ underestimated movement of the pelvic floor by nearly 60 per cent in 21 patients tested; mean descent was 1.2 cm, compared with a radiographic mean descent of 2.9 cm (P < 0.001). Since the instrument measures movement of the anal verge, not the pelvic floor, no account is taken of anal canal shortening. Radiographic methods are still necessary for the reliable identification of abnormal descent.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献